Search for: "Feldman v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
United States, in which the court held that a defendant had been prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice that a guilty plea would not result in mandatory deportation. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
In the account’s “bio” line, Trump identifies himself as the “45th President of the United States of America. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
United States, in which the court will decide next term whether the Fourth Amendment requires that the government obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers, observing that the case calls on the justices to “puzzle over the implications of an 18th-century rule for a distinctly 21st-century reality. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
United States, the justices ruled 8-0 that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
United States. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps surveys the eight immigration cases awaiting decision at the court, observing that “history may record this term as a blockbuster in one area that has become eerily relevant to America in 2017: how much due process is owed to immigrants, undocumented aliens, aliens outside the United States—and even naturalized citizens. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman looks at the decision, noting that the opinion puts the state and federal courts in the United States “on the same page with the Special Commission of the Hague Conference, the US State Department, most if not all foreign courts, and more or less all writers on the subject. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
United States, which asks whether a naturalized U.S. citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
United States, the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
City of Joliet and Endrew F. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the career of Noel Francisco, President Donald Trump’s nominee for solicitor general, concluding that given “Francisco’s regular successful representations of conservative clients, track record of work with the US Government under Republican Presidents, clerkships with highly regarded conservative judges like Justice Scalia, and multiple appearances before the United States Supreme Court in his private… [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 6:19 am
United States, the Supreme Court keeps holding on to the fantasy that the guidelines are just advice, not rules. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am
United States, holding that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
