Search for: "Felt v. Price" Results 1 - 20 of 717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2013, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law, has posted "The Price of Privacy, 1973 to the Present." [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:35 pm
  The plain fact is that there was nothing by way of constraint to raise prices, felt or otherwise, from which any party had to withdraw, or with which it was necessary to act inconsistently, if prices were not increased on a particular occasion. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Katherine A. Campbell
It was felt by government that the value of agreements between landowners and telecoms operators should closer reflect the price that utilities companies pay landowners for wayleaves. [read post]
 However, having fought essentially the same undue burden issues before in Idenix v Gilead [2014] EWHC 3916 (Pat), it is unlikely Gilead felt they got two trials for the price of one! [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Katherine A. Campbell
It was felt by government that the value of agreements between landowners and telecoms operators should closer reflect the price that utilities companies pay landowners for wayleaves. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm
Wolff felt that it was still owed a commission based on the $1.3 million price because the company had procured a "ready and willing" buyer. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  They felt that there was sufficient evidence to support a claim for legal malpractice against the other party's attorneys. [read post]