Search for: "Ferency v. Secretary of State"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2012, 10:58 am
” The majority explained that in Ferency v Secretary of State, 409 Mich 569 (1980), the Michigan Supreme Court interpreted “altered or abrogated” to mean ”if the proposed amendment would add to, delete from or change the existing wording of the provision, or would render it wholly inoperative,” rather than merely affecting the operation of the provision. [read post]