Search for: "Ferrara v. US"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 9:55 am
Ferrara’s proposed use was that of a “private club,” it was subject to the BZA’s approval as a conditional use and was not specifically authorized. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:26 am
Case: Finkelstein Newman Ferrara LLP v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 11:00 pm
(Roberts v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 12:52 pm
On this week's legal-affairs podcast Lawyer2Lawyer, we consider Wyeth v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:39 am
” The use of “or” instead of “and” thus creates new law. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
Ferrara, Ann M. [read post]
12 May 2008, 6:25 am
But despite that change, in a 2003 decision, in a case known as Colonnade Management v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 5:25 am
Ferrara said one disturbing element of adverse possession is that the true owner pays taxes on property being used by someone else. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:06 am
In the case, Dodson v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
In Burbacki v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 04128 Decided on May 29, 2019 the Appellate Division, Second Department explains why: “The commencement of a bankruptcy proceeding creates an “estate” that is comprised of “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case” (11 USC § 541[a][1]; see Osborne… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:50 am
IT'S THE NATION'S LARGEST HOUSING-DISCRIMINATION CASEOn January 9, 2023, New York Supreme Court Justice Mary V. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:50 am
IT'S THE NATION'S LARGEST HOUSING-DISCRIMINATION CASEOn January 9, 2023, New York Supreme Court Justice Mary V. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 8:35 pm
(Subscription required.)BackgroundFiled by Newman Ferrara back in May of 2016 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the lawsuit, entitled Lennen v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:00 pm
Justice Mary V. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:57 am
Abrams, Fensterman, Eiseman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, supra 172 AD3d at 1300, citing Williams v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 12:25 am
The core issue in Gap, Inc. v 170 Broadway Retail Owner, LLC is whether the tenant’s inability to use its space as a viable retail store location (due to all the COVID-19 related restrictions and regulations) triggered the application of the “frustration of purpose” and “impossibility” doctrines. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am
I am merely suggesting that if they adopt this vision of Constitutional Conservatism, a bright legally-trained conservative (or libertarian) candidate who wants to deflect the charge they will take away a woman’s right to use contraceptives can, in good conscience, follow Peter Ferrara’s advice to counter that this was properly taken off the table by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm
Kassenoff, who along with Noe Solorzano, represented the daughter and filed the appeal on her behalf.# # #Link to the decision: Bass v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Tiger v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
Although not estates cases, Ferrara v. [read post]
