Search for: "Few v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 29,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 9:09 am
Approximately 48 hours after oral argument, a unanimous Washington State Supreme Court issued an order in Morgan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Brooks, 436 U.S. 149 (1978), the Court has also held that “very few” functions fall into that category. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Husted v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a few times about the recent Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:38 pm by H. Scott Leviant
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held, in Timbs v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 5:04 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
In part: Many people, and I suspect quite a few of the justices,... [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am by MBettman
On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]