Search for: "Fictitious Defendants A, B, C and D" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 4:04 am
’” 1 LaFave, supra, § 2.1(d), at 443 (quoting Amsterdam, Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment, 58 Minn. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Robinson , No. 075474 Conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the district court erroneously instructed the jury to determine the quantity of cocaine "involved in the conspiracy" instead of the quantity individually attributable to defendant; 2) the district court failed to charge a violation of 21 U.S.C. section 841(b)(1)(C) as a lesser-included offense; 3) the evidence was insufficient to prove… [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
He begins by explaining that [b]efore the Court is Defendant Michael Coscia's . . . [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
  Choosing the right criminal defense attorney to defend your case and protect your rights is critical. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:17 am
Here's what the revision did to the statute: (1) A person commits the crime of criminal impersonation if he or she: (a) Assumes a false identity and does an act in his or her assumed character with intent to gain a pecuniary benefit for himself, herself, or another or to deceive or harm another; (b) (a) Pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and does an act in his or her pretended fictitious capacity with the intent to gain a pecuniary benefit for… [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:25 am
The deadline for the call for papers for the Conference on Issues of Fact: The Pathologies of Fact and the Fictitious in Law and the Humanities has been extended to June 21st, 2015. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 105/16(6) To keep court documents public and respect the privacy of people who deserve it, the Illinois statute allows you to file under fictitious names (usually John Doe or Jane Doe) “Upon application and for good cause shown the parties may appear under fictitious names. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:40 pm by jefhenninger
  The jury will really hate the defendant as he will be seen as Madoff’s right hand man. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
[D]efining the offense … is not simple ..., and there is a danger of a slippery slope: Will it be considered rape every time a man lies to a woman concerning a detail which she considers of essence and because of it she decides to have intercourse with him? [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The trustee lost one fraudulent-transfer case based on foreign sovereign immunity but survived motions to dismiss in two cases in which allegations of defendant complicity arguably hindered the ability of the defendants to avail themselves of theBankruptcy Code’s “safe harbor” provisions (as discussed below). [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 5:22 am by Florian Mueller
There is no balancing in the sense of a passage that would say procompetitive benefits X and Y outweigh the anticompetitive effects A, B, and C. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Falk and Wilson allegedly made false statements to a group of convention attendees, including romance novel authors and publishers, that: (a) Alexander and Young were involved in secret, inappropriate, illicit, salacious, and scandalous relationships with each other and third parties; (b) were blackmailing publishers and others into using and promoting Plaintiffs’ goods and services; (c) Young was a predator; (d) Wilson was living in fear because of Young’s… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:38 pm by Michael Lowe
  Insofar as health care fraud claims, the AUSA must introduce authenticated and admissible evidence establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the provider-defendant: knowingly made a claim or statement to get the government to pay money on a health care insurance claim for goods or services; and that the claim or statement was false, fictitious, or fraudulent. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In doing so, they applied the following test, [180] To impose liability on the defendant for the tort of passing off the plaintiff must satisfy me that: a) it enjoys goodwill attached to the educational services it provides; b) its services have acquired a distinctiveness in the marketplace; c) the defendant has caused confusion by intentionally or otherwise misrepresenting its services as those of the plaintiff; and d) the plaintiff is likely to suffer… [read post]