Search for: "Field v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
The fencing was a response to an increase in the number of migrants crossing the border into the United States, many of whom are seeking asylum. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
EFF had a welcome opportunity to direct attention toward the less-often discussed other potential uses of blockchains when we were invited to testify before the United States House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:47 pm
Smith v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Likewise with Muir v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
” If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
It can safely be said that no other field of law has undergone such radical change, as a few examples will show. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
His experience and expertise in the field will greatly contribute to the success and growth of our Funds practice group. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
CAAF held in 2023 in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am
Here is a selection of items written by members of the Lieber family: Items written by Francis Lieber related to law and political science: Instructions for the government of armies of the United States in the field (The Lieber Code), 1898. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
—Herb Denenberg, former Commissioner of Insurance for Pennsylvania 1Jarrett v. [read post]
