Search for: "Fields v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 1:48 pm
Photo Album: District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
School District No. 33 (Chilliwack) court decision was released by the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Vancouver on June 26, 2009. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:05 am
The District of Columbia Circuit reversed. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 7:53 am
The Court remanded the case to the District Court to reconsider the likelihood of its success and to weigh other factors against granting the injunction.KazakhstanWA and WB v. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 5:22 pm
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
The decision, UPMC Braddock v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:30 pm
EgyptNaguib Gabriel and others v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:25 am
Alasaad v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm
GoogleDecision Date: May 27, 2020 The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia dismissed Freedom Watch’s appeal against the District Court’s decision which had dismissed its complaint alleging violation of the First Amendment, the Sherman Antitrust Act and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 4:51 pm
United StatesSandvig v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 4:59 pm
Agency for Global MediaDecision Date: November 20, 2020 The United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction against actions taken by senior management at the U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:45 am
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:59 am
Cato Institute v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
Š. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
Puttaswamy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:20 am
Facts: This case (Arthur Lee Dickerson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 4:09 pm
Relying on Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:55 am
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May… [read post]
