Search for: "Fields v. Quinn*" Results 41 - 60 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2016, 3:14 am
Quinney College of Law, Salt Lake City, Utah]: Retail Royalty Company v Hawke & Company Outfitters LLC, Opposition No. 91197848 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown first below, for "Jackets, shirts, pants, swimwear, socks, hats, belts and scarves," on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the three marks shown next below, for various clothing items]. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
I didn't attend yesterday's hearing because the dispute over this one is only about damages and if the patent had been upheld by the Federal Patent Court, the appeals court's infringement ruling would have come down in December and I would have focused on the outcome of that one.Various Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Yesterday, Samantha Barbas present on her book, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:14 pm by Michael Froomkin
In 1974 he became a teaching fellow at Harvard Law School, where he taught and did graduate study in the field of clinical law. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
Finally, arguments that these laws "level the playing field" between online and brick-and-mortar business are not true: Far from creating a level playing field, Amazon taxes move away from one. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 11:07 pm
Other topics covered include* Gadi Oron (legal adviser, IFPI), giving a crisp, simple account of the ECJ's ruling in the Spanish reference in SGAE v Rafael Hoteles as to whether the provision of TV programmes to hotel rooms constituted an act of communication to the public for which royalties might be legitimately sought;* "A Whiter Shade of Pale" by Best & Soames' Hubert Best, a commentary on the recent UK copyright litigation over authorship of the 1960s Procol… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am by Florian Mueller
Maybe the appeals court won't agree with every single part of Judge Posner's reasoning, but Motorola's positions are so very ridiculous that Chief Judge Rader asked the following two rhetorical questions:"Isn't it crazy to give that much value [hundred of millions of dollars] to one patent in a crowded field? [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:02 pm
Examples of recent panel topics include: Imagining Rights in the Era of Globalization; The Child as a Legal Subject; Law and Love; The Color of Justice; The Cultural Lives of the Judiciary; Law and the Sacred; E.M.Forster and the Question of Social Justice; Thinking about Places and Spaces; Feminism v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
Perhaps this table was intended to be all inclusive, but I do not see, for example, Ball Aerosol v. [read post]