Search for: "Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court determined that, absent other consideration, at-will employment must continue for two years in order to constitute consideration for the enforcement of competition restrictions. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court determined that, absent other consideration, at-will employment must continue for two years in order to constitute consideration for the enforcement of competition restrictions. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Fifield was assigned to work exclusively for Premier Dealer Services (PDS), a subsidiary of Great American. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. that an employer needed to provide consideration beyond mere employment itself to validate a non-compete, most business (read: management-side) attorneys thought this decision was a misread that was inevitably headed for reversal.Not so.The Supreme Court of Illinois has denied the Petition for Leave to Appeal that Premier Dealer Services filed after Fifield prevailed on his consideration argument. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm
Dow, Jr., who held in Traffic Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., you may not realize that I sat in on that case as the fourth justice. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:59 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. had received in Illinois federal courts, which is set forth in my March 6 post "Fifield, Federal Style. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 2:03 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm
Dow, Jr., who held in Traffic Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
In Fifield v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:23 am
Premier Dealer Services, 2013 IL App. (1st) 120327 that, absent other consideration, two years of employment are required for a restrictive covenant to be supported by adequate consideration, regardless of whether the covenant was signed at the outset of employment or after, and regardless of whether the employee quit or was fired. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., Docket No. 1-12-0327 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
., Cook County) held in Fifield v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:29 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:23 am
Premier Dealer Services, 2013 IL App. (1st) 120327 that, absent other consideration, two years of employment are required for a restrictive covenant to be supported by adequate consideration, regardless of whether the covenant was signed at the outset of employment or after, and regardless of whether the employee quit or was fired. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:19 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
