Search for: "Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
In Fifield v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
., Cook County) held in Fifield v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:52 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., which held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration – even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer – and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:52 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., which held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration – even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer – and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
Premier Dealer Services and Prairie Rheumatology Assocs., S.C. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120327 has caused much head-scratching, and the Illinois legislature essentially punted on the issue in the recent amendments to the Illinois Freedom to Work Act, 820 ILCS 90/1, et seq. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:14 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. involves an insurance salesman marketing finance and insurance products to the automotive industry. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., Docket No. 1-12-0327 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:32 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. (2013 IL App (1st) 120327) Fifield v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:12 pm
The case is Fifield v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Premier Dealer Services, which altered the landscape of noncompete law in Illinois by seemingly declaring a bright-line rule that an employee must have worked for his or her employer for two years in order for the employer to subsequently enforce a noncompete clause. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 IL App. (1st) 120327. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Premier Dealer Services, which permits employees to challenge the adequacy of consideration when they sign noncompete clauses (and held that employment of less than two years was insufficient consideration). [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:34 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., but clarifies what constitutes consideration if the employee does not meet the two-year employment prong discussed in that case. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:23 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 Ill. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:25 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 933 N.E.2d 938 (Ill. [read post]
