Search for: "Fifty Below Sales v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
By Order, dated January 14, 2008, United States Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, granted the motion (the "Motion") filed by a group of creditors seeking transfer of venue of the Dunmore Homes, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
By Order, dated January 14, 2008, United States Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, granted the motion (the "Motion") filed by a group of creditors seeking transfer of venue of the Dunmore Homes, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:30 am
Its current annual revenues are about $8 million and its sells in all fifty states. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:02 am
” Bidart was allegedly selling Sifra potatoes from a source other than Zuckerman or HZPC, below the price offered by plaintiffs, which had affected the sale of as many as 280,000 fifty-pound units of plaintiffs’ Bella Blanca brand potatoes. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
See recent case opinions below: James V. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:00 pm
Next Tuesday, in Credit Suisse v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment below. 07a0421p.06 Kouljinski v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm
McGraw Hill et al, was then heard on Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
The project would, over a 20-30 year period, demolish and replace the townhouse units and add 5,679 new units, some of which would be below-and-at-market rate rentals, and some of which would be for sale. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 10:28 pm
A United States trustee supervises the administration of the case. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 8:30 pm
The 2016 Colorado Computer Crime Case Of People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 am
But the program could very well violate antitrust and competition laws in the United States, the European Commission, or other jurisdictions. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm
The Supreme Court effectively redefined the concept in 1922 in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
The Lord Advocate submits that vodka is of particular relevance in its sale in Scotland versus England and Wales, at the rate below the fifty pence rate. 1510: The Lord Advocate addresses the Court that Scotland has a per capita consumption of alcohol which is higher than England and Wales and alcohol mortality rates for men in Scotland were double than those in England and Wales, with a similar pattern for women. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
This issue is dealt with in Park Place Estates v. [read post]
