Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 501 - 520
of 15,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 8:57 pm
Arden.A newspaper’s inflated circulation claims could not form the basis of a Lanham Act false advertising action brought by the publisher of a free television guide because the publisher did not begin soliciting advertisers until after the newspaper publicly acknowledged its misstatements and revised its circulation claims and because the inflated circulation figures were not part of a commercial campaign, according to the federal district court in Central Islip, New York (Conte… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:41 am
The tendered evidence has led me to reject ASIC's figures as to the financial circumstances of One.Tel at the end of February, March and April 2001and to prefer the figures set out in Chs 11, 13 and 15 respectively. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 11:50 am
The Appellate Commissioner then has to figure out precisely how much Flynn has to pay. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:08 am
(See Stern v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:05 am
Additional Resources: Panzera v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
In Matal v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
He held (at paragraph 26) that this approach was wrong, thus overruling the decision in GW v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
FOSTA always targeted Backpage; but with Backpage gone before FOSTA became law, it seemed inevitable that plaintiffs would eventually figure out how to deploy FOSTA against other targets. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
This spring, SCOTUS will weigh in on white-collar exemptions for the first time in Christopher v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Figuring out the players takes a bit of work. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court upheld FIFA’s claim and found that the figurative marks “PUMA WORLD CUP QATAR 2022” and “PUMA WORLD CUP 2022” were misleading. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:11 pm
It's always difficult to figure out who should live and who should die. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
Give it a read and see if you can figure out what the hell happened in it. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:55 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:26 am
Supreme Court held 8-1 in Snyder v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 11:37 am
For all of the intrigue of (alleged) six-figure tanking bonuses, and clumsily-arranged meet-cutes on James Bond villain mega-yachts, Flores et al. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
In Bluford v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 1:23 pm
Having taken the time to read through the Respondent’s brief in the Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:57 am
Ward v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
And the public's probably pretty happy with the hypertechnical way the Court figures out the meaning of that word.The question is a simple one: Are you shooting "at" an occupied motor vehicle when:(A) You and the gun you're firing are outside the vehicle you're shooting "at";(B) Your hand and the gun are inside the vehicle you're shooting "at" but the rest of your body is outside it; and(C) You and the gun are… [read post]
