Search for: "Film 44, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
YouTube, Inc., et. al. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
In Google Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 5:30 pm
Kushner, Inc. by Vicky Ward (2019)26. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:46 am
For example, Jane Doe creates a film. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
The sixth circuit court made a decision about sampling which again altered the way it was governed in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, the Court held that paid professional charity solicitations were fully protected First Amendment speech because the commercial aspects of the solicitations could not be disentangled from the content of the charitable program.[9] As the plurality explained in 44 Liquormart v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
Whether or not protection of nudity in films-- including art films-- is a good idea, the decision by the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:02 pm
Food Lion, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am
The company was ordered to pay Ojo, ₦20 million (US$44 448) in damages. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner) Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46) South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s)… [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:28 am
” Megaupload claims that its program that paid uploaders depending on the popularity of the files they uploaded didn’t encourage infringement because someone’s family photos could just as likely be as popular as a copy of the latest blockbuster film. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’” (page 31 – with reference to the well-known decision in Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
In the district court, the plaintiff, Nancey Silvers, claimed that the defendant, Sony Pictures, had infringed the copyright in a television movie she had written on a work-for-hire basis with the production company Frank & Bob Films.6 Since Silvers had no ownership interest in the copyright by way of her work-for-hire contract,7 Frank & Bob Films assigned to her the accrued causes of action so that she could pursue the alleged infringement on her own. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
This willingness to look behind an issued patent may be contrasted with the Federal Court of Appeal’s reluctance to do just that, although in different circumstances, in Corlac Inc. v Weatherford Canada 2011 FCA 228 (“Corlac”). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Professional Janitorial Service, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
” Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:23 pm
Its creditors included non-profit organizations and celebrities.[11] Notably, Anthology Film Archives, founded by Jonas Mekas, sued Paddle8 for withholding funds from a benefit auction held in November 2019.[12] Other creditors were the Bieber couple, Jay Z’s Shawn Carter Foundation, and the Rema Hort Mann Foundation.[13] After the resignation of almost the entire management team, the court appointed an independent trustee, and the company was liquidated, including the sale of its… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
DoubleVerify Inc., 439 P.3d 1156 (Cal. 2019). [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:38 am
Huntington Ingalls Ind., Inc. v. [read post]
