Search for: "Final Analysis Communication v. General Dynamics" Results 1 - 20 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
Final version to be published as “Dynamic Societal Constitutionalism: Transnational corporations’ outward expression of inward self constitution: The enforcement of human rights by Apple, Inc. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
With this in mind, I will now suggest four general “framework principles” to inform a CWS analysis that properly accounts for innovation and dynamic factors. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:01 am by Susan Brenner
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of his argument by noting that in 1998, the [Virginia] General Assembly amended Code § 18.2-60 to criminalize threats contained in `electronically transmitted communication[s] producing a visual or electronic message. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
Nixon’s holdings about the susceptibility to subpoena of the president’s official communications. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
Can the innovator-generic dynamic change the current IP scenario, wonders Annsley? [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:10 am by John Ottaviani
Investordigs * Campbell v General Dynamics (II) [Photo credit: A hand comes right out of the laptop screen to shake hands // ShutterStock] [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:18 am by Alden Abbott
This conclusion is buttressed by the tenor of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2021 opinion in AMG Capital v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
Analysis As Marty Lederman and Robert Litt have pointed out, it has been the longstanding view of the Executive branch that this and similar statutes must be read to give the President the final word on whether and how classified information will be provided to the congressional intelligence committees. [read post]
Readers can find a more detailed description of the Ninth Circuit’s analysis elsewhere on Lawfare. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Final version to be published as “Dynamic Societal Constitutionalism: Transnational corporations’ outward expression of inward self constitution: The enforcement of human rights by Apple, Inc. [read post]