Search for: "Final Analysis Communication v. General Dynamics"
Results 121 - 140
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
At the same time, current contract terms or restrictions may limit the sharing of such threat or incident information with executive departments and agencies (agencies) that are responsible for investigating or remediating cyber incidents, such as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and other elements of the Intelligence Community (IC). [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Seen this before w/Hatch-Waxman w/communications about generics suggesting they were outdated or less effective. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 12:52 pm
General Observations About the Work Streams V. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
This wasn’t inconsistent with Fortune Dynamic, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Are there ways to generate more reliable empirical evidence of consumers’ impressions? [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The properties had been the marital residence and had no present value but might generate income. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The properties had been the marital residence and had no present value but might generate income. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Nothing in the record on appeal permits this Court to depart from the assumption that juries generally follow explicit instructions: see R. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
See Couch v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
Their data is accurate (after all, they got it from us) and other experts tell me that their analysis is correct on every point. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Finally, a request was filed regarding one of the Ronald Katz telephone patents (see ex parte Request No. (3)). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Finally, a request was filed regarding one of the Ronald Katz telephone patents (see ex parte Request No. (3)). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Finally, involving Section 230 in transparency legislation would make the cost of legislators’ own mistakes much higher. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
FDR rewarded Jackson with stewardship of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division in 1937, then appointed him solicitor general (1938), then attorney general (1940) and, finally in 1941, Supreme Court justice. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The syllabus is constructed with these general ideas in mind. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
Because of these distinctions, it’s important to distinguish cases and not draw broad generalizations. [read post]
