Search for: "Finch v. Backes"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court issued a powerful decision in Flowers v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:39 am
Jones 13th floor 269th 176th Judge Nikita V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
But he was black in the whitest part of North Texas, and it took me a year to get his daughter back. [read post]
31 May 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court in Woodson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:41 pm
Texas DOT v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 12:27 am
York Finch General Hospital, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 647, at paras. 87-88, and Blackwater v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
State, 198 So. 120 (Fla. 1940) Finch v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
State, 198 So. 120 (Fla. 1940) Finch v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
In the recent case of Finch v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
In the recent case of Finch v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:15 pm
Additional Resources: Social Security supports National Cancer Survivors Day, June 5, 2016, The Sharron Herald, By John Finch More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:53 am
” State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:04 pm
” And most of all, she acknowledges that she was “furious” at the Supreme Court for Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:57 am
This movement attracted the South’s most respectable factions—its real-life Atticus Finches. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:56 pm
Faculty lounge blogger Steve Lubet's essay, "Reconstructing Atticus Finch," in the Michigan Law Review back in 1999 was part of the movement to question Atticus' ideas when he was seen as a heroic figure by so many. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 1:37 pm
Atticus' critique of Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Oakley, John V. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm
Mobley v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
(B.C.C.A., Mar. 22, 2012) (34889) Feb. 15, 2013 Chief Justice: “We are all of the view that the appeal should be allowed, for the reasons of Chief Justice Finch." [read post]
