Search for: "Fine v. People"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 2:57 am
Ross, IJ “Short Circuit,” on Robinson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Justice Hoffstadt begins today's opinion by saying the following:"Earlier this year, one of our sister courts in People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:58 pm
But I'm nonetheless fine with Mr. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:14 pm
In the second and third cases, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and imposed a restitution fund fine and a probation revocation fine. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:27 pm
People v Trevor Frederick, decided June 10th, is an odd set of facts. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:57 am
R. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:36 am
In Austin v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
" Hale v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Dueñas" -- which is ironic, as the opinion (which is actually People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:02 pm
However, most poor people face legal debt without having faced prison or parole, but as a routine municipal fine or fee for local ordinance violations. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:07 am
Christopher Niebel v Information Commissioner – 14 October 2013 We have just succeeded in an appeal to the Information Rights Tribunal against a fine of £300,000 issued by the Information Commissioner against one of our clients for a breach of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 11:43 am
In People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:01 am
In most states, people convicted of crimes pay fines, restitution, court costs and other fees. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:17 am
On September 27, Kozinski's Favorite Flicks offers the 1996 biopic The People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:04 pm
On Sept. 4, the Court of Appeal increased the fine to $750,000 in its ruling in R. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
More for its style rather than its substance (though I think the latter is fine as well).But, as to the former, I like it how Justice Huffman slams -- fairly forcefully -- the various arguments of "the People" (e.g., the deputy AG's) on appeal in a manner that makes it clear that he expects more from the AG's office than existed here and yet avoids being offensive. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:03 am
Jurors from Capitol Records, et al v. [read post]
