Search for: "Firestone v. State of Indiana"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:08 pm
Firestone, et al v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Cl. 565 (2011), (Firestone, J.) [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:15 am
Finding that it does not, the court repudiates Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:15 am
"
Indiana v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
Cl. 565 (2011), (Firestone, J.) [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We discussed Fields v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
