Search for: "First Equity Corp. v. Standard & Poor's Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Joseph Medical Corp. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
The First Amendment precluded the suit. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Heller’s contention without those — possibly unconscionable — fees first being paid. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
” First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:28 pm
Cybor Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
The First Amendment rules have to be the same for rich speakers (or speakers well-off enough to have insurance) as for poor speakers. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:30 am
Here's what the court said: Nor, contrary to plaintiffs' contention, does the buyout of a deceased partner's interest implicate all of the factors that our courts have relied upon in denying discounts in the corporate minority or dissenting shareholder contexts (see Matter of Penepent Corp., 96 NY2d 186, 194 [2001]; Matter of Friedman v Beway Realty Corp., 87 NY2d 161, 167, 169-170 [1995]). [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
This has been the teaching of cases following the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Rapid-American Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:17 am
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:41 pm
In Brehm v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:03 am
However, defensive responses to hostile tender offers, such as shareholder rights plans, must pass what some view as the enhanced business judgment scrutiny of the Unocal test, first enunciated in the 1985 case Unocal v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:15 pm
Corp., 488 F.3d 982, 999 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (Spicy IP), India: Ranbaxy-Daiichi deal – Opportunities for private equity companies in India: (Profitability through Simplicity), India: (KEI) Cracking open anti-competitive practices in the developing world: complaints, amendments and waivers: (Spicy IP), India: Is it one rule for Indian pharma companies and another one for those from abroad? [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The Madoff liquidation case is Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Here, the SEC instituted proceedings against Tilton and her Patriarch Partners firms in March of 2015, alleging that she and her firms hid the poor performance of the companies that she’d invested in. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court confirmed in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
