Search for: "First Resort Properties LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2022, 8:13 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
District Judge Stephanie Haines of the Western District of Pennsylvania recently discussed its application at length in Seven Springs Mountain Resort v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Telephone and Telegraph Companies The first came in the early 1900s, where some government officials demanded that telephone and telegraph companies block access to their services by people suspected of running illegal gambling operations. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Florian Mueller
In order for Epic to prevail on tying, the appeals court would in a first step have to agree with the DOJ that even something that is not sold or licensed separately can constitute a market.There is light and there is shadow in the district court's ruling. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
  The Opponent, together with Viceroy Hotels, LLC, held intellectual property for the Viceroy Hotel Group (VHG) which operated hotels and reports in North America, South America, the Caribbean, and the Middle East under the name Viceroy from 2002. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
  The Opponent, together with Viceroy Hotels, LLC, held intellectual property for the Viceroy Hotel Group (VHG) which operated hotels and reports in North America, South America, the Caribbean, and the Middle East under the name Viceroy from 2002. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 7:18 am by Justin K. Beyer
Through the first part of the test, a court evaluates whether the temporal and scope restrictions of the covenant are “reasonable. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 9:02 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Andrew Vaccaro
The court held it did not, but did not decide whether such statutory procedures were generally waivable or modifiable outside of arbitration.Reprinted (with some modification) with permission from the February 9, 2022, issue date of the “New York Law Journal” © 2022 ALM Media Properties, LLC. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
The case involved a First Amendment challenge to the denial of a tax exemption for a church-owned property occupied by a couple whom the church designated as its ministers. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
But I do believe they are generally constitutionally permissible in many situations, given that property owners generally don't have a First Amendment right to exclude speakers or speech they dislike,[1] and given the broad acceptance of bans on discrimination based on religious affiliation. [read post]