Search for: "First Unitarian Church v. Los Angeles"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2014, 5:57 pm
In First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:35 am
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:53 am
The five entities joining the First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:26 am
EFF's other challenge to NSA surveillance, First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:40 pm
As we argue in First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
NSA and First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:55 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
Obama, and still another in First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:51 am
We argue in our lawsuit First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, et al v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:51 pm
The two others are First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm
Related Issues: NSA SpyingRelated Cases: First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:03 am
AT&TFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
NSA) to be extended to a second case (First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles et al v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
Obama and First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:55 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:39 pm
The government misinterpreted Section 215 of the Patriot Act as allowing it to collect in bulk all call records from numerous phone companies for renewable 90-day periods, an interpretation we challenged in our First Unitarian v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:05 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:19 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:06 am
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 7:20 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]