Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 919
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Fisher, 2016 U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 3:42 pm
The district court agreed. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am
” An online symposium at the University of Miami Law Review anticipates the decision in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro focuses on the Court’s grant of review in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am
Briefly: At Forbes, Daniel Fisher urges the Court to grant review in the antitrust case FTC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
Frost v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
” In other news, on Wednesday the Court will hear oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:44 am
Over defense objection the district court held that the riot statute was overinclusive, but divisible. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 8:20 am
PCR, Inc., 754 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 2000) and Fisher v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Fisher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm
· Fisher v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
On December 9, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inFisher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
Judge Bennett certified four questions of Iowa law to the Iowa Supreme Court.: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court case Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:34 pm
The district court and Ninth agreed that this testimony was “vague. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 8:43 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
The 9th reverses a district court's ruling precluding 404(b) evidence in an insider trading case. [read post]
