Search for: "Fitzgerald v. Open Hands" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
   Lemunier-Fitzgerald presents a Birchfield issue (for a discussion of Birchfield v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Fitzgerald, 2011 WI 43, on the Wisconsin Eye public affairs show “Legally Speaking. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Although the Court held 15 years after deciding Fitzgerald, in Clinton v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:56 pm by Elena Kagan, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
But as Judge Mehta noted, Fitzgerald held that presidential immunity did not depend on the legality of the president’s action. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 5:51 pm
David Boundy, Vice President & Assistant General Counsel Intellectual Property at Cantor Fitzgerald LP , sent a note of importance to the patent community regarding a notice and comment period, which opened last week and closes on March 16, 2008   (See: Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, Request for Comment, 74 Fed. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:48 am by Joshua R. Goodbaum
Supreme Court will take another crack at standards of proof in employment cases later this Term when it hands down its decision in Babb v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  The most recent account-stated opinions handed down by Texas appellate courts no longer even cite the old cases whence the cause of action on open account and account stated stem from. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
Bush is questionable because the standard of review in those cases was quite different from the case at hand. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:59 pm by Rich Vetstein
” Corrine Fitzgerald, 2015 president of the Massachusetts Association of Realtors and broker-owner of Fitzgerald Real Estate in Greenfield, agreed, calling it a “good decision. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
"  At the subsequent board meeting Maher and Fitzgerald offered a $50,000 buyout payable over two years, which they viewed as an "opening bid" in expectation of further negotiations. [read post]