Search for: "Fitzpatrick v. Federer" Results 61 - 80 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 4:45 am by Ted Frank
Moreover, nothing in the Federal Arbitration Act prohibits state attorneys general from bringing consumer actions against defendants who are actually unfairly treating a class of consumers. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:30 am
This Oregon benefit is separate and distinct from the federal VA Home Loan Guaranty and has lent approximately $8 billion in low-interest home loans to more than 334,000 veterans since 1945. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:43 pm by Walter Olson
Fannie/Freddie genre of government-sponsored enterprises called “monstrous moral hybrids” [Mark Calabria, Cato] Posner: lawyers appeared more likely to run junk-fax suit for own interests than clients’ [Beck, Trask (Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “”It is a well-established principle that a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Court address claims of breach of contract, negligent termination and defamation alleged by educatorWilliams v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm by Law Lady
The court rejected plaintiff's comparison of the definitions of the term "employer" found in the ADEA and Title VII, in conjunction with the Supreme Court's opinion in Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:51 am by Jon Hyman
Also on Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Quon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:41 am by Jon Hyman
— via Fitzpatrick on Employment Law Can you sack an employee for having “friends with benefits”? [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:00 am
 The US Supreme Court issued the much-awaited decision in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 10:23 pm
Congress may only abrogate sovereign immunity pursuant to its § 5 powers, not its Article I powers (see Fitzpatrick v. [read post]