Search for: "Flanagan v. Flanagan" Results 41 - 60 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 4:19 am by INFORRM
  The most recent judicial libel damages were awarded in Elliott v Flanagan £48,750 after mitigation and Coulter v Sunday Newspapers Limited, £50,000. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Flanagan v. duMont (Flanagan), 2016 VT 115By Elizabeth KruskaThe facts of this post-divorce action remind me of pulling on a loose thread and then everything unravels. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Authored by Mark Flanagan, Patrick Carome and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Hale. * GitHub Letter. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland In the case of Flanagan v AIG (Europe) Ltd [2016] NIQB 49 the High Court dismissed a claim by former Sinn Féin MLA, Phil Flanagan, against an insurance company in which he was seeking insurance cover for a libel award of almost £50,000 made against him. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 12:45 pm by Jonathan Bailey
The post 3 Count: Batman v Superman v Piracy appeared first on Plagiarism Today. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland In the case of Elliott v Flanagan [2016] NIQB 8, Stephens J awarded the claimant, Thomas Elliott MP, damages of £48,750 again MLA Phil Flanagan. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Madenspacher back on August 27, 2015 in the case of Eversole v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
Flanagan also apologised for a defamatory tweet about rival Tom Elliott’s conduct during his previous career as a soldier. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Lawsplainer: How The Sixth Circuit Stood Up To Hecklers (And Cops)” [Popehat on Michigan case of Bible Believers v. [read post]