Search for: "Fletcher v. District Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 1:53 am
US v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 10:28 am
(Recall that the Supreme Court has explained in Foster v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:25 am
The district court precluded the line of questioning under the rape shield law, FRE 412. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" * Vehicle and Traffic Law §318[3][a]-[b] mandates a one-year license revocation upon such conviction. ** See Matter of Wignall v Fletcher, 303 NY 435. *** When entering Plaintiff's violations into the DMV database, a DMV employee apparently misspelled Plaintiff's surname, which DMV acknowledged was a "possible data-entry error. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" * Vehicle and Traffic Law §318[3][a]-[b] mandates a one-year license revocation upon such conviction. ** See Matter of Wignall v Fletcher, 303 NY 435. *** When entering Plaintiff's violations into the DMV database, a DMV employee apparently misspelled Plaintiff's surname, which DMV acknowledged was a "possible data-entry error. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:13 am
The 9th (Fletcher joined by Rawlison and Selna) held that under AEDPA, Ariz. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:50 am
The district court found this was not custodial. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 12:14 pm
The complaint, (full text) in Fletcher v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
For example, in EEOC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:21 am
For example, in EEOC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:37 pm
Barry Bonds wins again.He lost in the district court, which was fine with his conviction after a jury trial for obstruction of justice. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm
In my next post I'll get back to the political implications, given that there could be an en banc review by 11 judges (not three), with a Democratic majority being very likely.When asked for case law above the level of a district court that would support the "No License-No Chips" part of Judge Koh's ruling, the FTC's special counsel, Professor Fletcher, gave the 1922 United Shoe Machinery v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:41 pm
Justice Elena Kagan intervened, arguing that the court’s decision in Kloeckner v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 5:02 am
The 9th does remand for the district court to determine if the government acted without any legitimate interest (irrationally) in refusing to move for a 3rd point. [read post]
