Search for: "Flores v. Fourth Court of Appeals"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 10:53 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal issued its ruling in Flores v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
Under Skilling v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v Seljan, October 23, 2008, upheld federal officials seizure of the defendant's letters during a routine search. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
On appeal, the Eighth Circuit affirmed, relying on its recent decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:08 pm
Id.Issue(s): [Ed. note: The ‘84 Supreme Court decision Richardson v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am
He also disagreed with the Court’s legislative history discussion: "[t]he statute’s text is clear, and I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals on that ground alone. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:33 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit got it wrong—again—ruling last week in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 5:48 am
The defendant appeals, upon our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court's judgments of conviction, arguing that his statements should have been suppressed as the product of an illegal search, in violation of the fourth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution, because the warrant authorizing the search of his apartment was unsupported by probable cause. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
Flores–Montano, (541 U.S. 149, 152 (2004)).U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:35 pm
However, the Third and Fourth Circuits have held that Flores-Ortega did not announce a new rule of constitutional law. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:05 pm
Published CCA case: Flores v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 pm
Pena-Flores, sometimes also cited as State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:07 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
This view is most consistent with the Supreme Court's holding in Flores-Ortega that a defendant is prejudiced by the forfeiture of an appeal regardless of its apparent merit. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:09 am
Mountain Valley appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the California Court of Appeals – Fourth District: People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Montes-Flores, Fourth Circuit.pdf: After Appellant was sentenced to 46 months imprisonment for illegal reentry into the United States, he appealed his sentence. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 520 (1997). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Court of Appeals, 5th Div. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:12 am
The court also construed a United States Supreme Court's opinion, permitting warrantless searches of vehicles impounded by the police, to constitute binding authority only under the Fourth Amendment, U.S. [read post]
