Search for: "Florida v. Rodriguez" Results 201 - 220 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 2253(c)(2); and (3) whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
The Michael Geist blog has an article on the Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez’s Bill C-11, which opens the door to regulating user generated content and asserts jurisdiction over all audio-visual services worldwide. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by John Elwood
§ 2253(c)(2); and (3) whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 conference)   Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm by Kate Howard
Rodriguez 15-1204Issue: (1) Whether aliens seeking admission to the United States who are subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
The Florida Bar — constitutionality under the First Amendment of a state ethical rule barring candidates for state judicial posts to personally solicit campaign funds Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 10:36 am by Lorene Park
A federal court in Indiana found this to be a convincing mosaic of evidence supporting her retaliation claim, which will go to trial (Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Nineteen other defendants were arrested in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Florida, and Texas and were expected to appear in federal courts in those states. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, 17-21, sounds familiar to you, that’s because Mr. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]