Search for: "Florida v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 6,402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1992) Justice O’Connor wrote the 6-3 majority opinion in a case about the respective roles of the federal government and the states under the 10th Amendment. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am by jonathanturley
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
CPLR § 2106 also provides: ”(b) The statement of any person, when that person is physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be used in an action in lieu of and with the same force and… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:37 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Petitioner alleged that she never consented to the child’s retention in the United States following the child’s short-term visit to Florida. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
  Andrew is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, and  the author of "Are You a Canadian Injured in the United States? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
The judge says the SAD Scheme “is the most efficient way to address the epidemic of counterfeit goods being sold in the United States on the internet by defendants located outside the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Something to bear in mind regarding this class action on behalf of everyone in the United States whose blood contains 0.05 parts per trillion or more of per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—a class that comprises everyone in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]