Search for: "Floyd v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2018, 10:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The named Defendants are the Creek Nation Principal Chief,James Floyd; the United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”); and the Hon. [read post]
Court of Appeal Before Jackson, Lloyd Jones and Floyd LJJ, [2013] EWCA Civ 616 (see here), the Home Secretary argued that the decision made Pham de facto stateless (with nationality but denied the protection which should go with it), but not de jure stateless (without nationality under the laws of any state) and therefore it did not make him stateless within the meaning of section 40(4) of the 1981 Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
June 12th is Loving Day, a holiday celebrating the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Since the hearing for Warner-Lambert v Actavis in February (IPKat post here), there has been growing speculation as to how far the UK Supreme Court would adopt the EPO approach, or seek to limit the requirement for plausibility.The case in questionIn the Court of Appeal ([2016] EWCA Civ 1006), Lord Justice Floyd upheld the High Court decision that claims 1 and 3 of the patent were insufficient. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
  The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Joy
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of February 8, 2021 from Wise Law on Twitter: Court sides with mentally disabled man after immigration hearing questions legitimacy of his marriageInternet harassment: Caplan v Atlas Prof. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court called a special session and heard oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]