Search for: "Floyd v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Bill Moyers' Journal on 4 Sept 09 had a debate of sorts between Trevor Potter and Floyd Abrams over issues surrounding Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:07 am
This guest Kat steps briefly out of his comfort zone to bring his dear readers slightly belated news of the Court of Appeal decision, handed down on 10 May 2012, in Nokia v IPCom [full citation:  Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg [2012] EWCA Civ 567 (10 May 2012)]. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
Hence Irwin LJ found that the “underlying principle in Zambrano is undisturbed by Chavez-Vilchez” and in the latter case the referring court was looking for guidance in circumstances where a child was dependent on one non-EU parent with no right of residence; circumstances in which the state must ensure a careful process of enquiry. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
 At first instance Mr Justice Floyd found the patent valid (under the headings of novelty, inventive step and sufficiency) although he construed the claim in one respect (the meaning of " a medicament for the treatment of a non-neoplastic disease or disorder characterised by undesirable excessive neovascularisation")  in a manner different from that put forward by either the claimants or the defendant, stating: I see no reason to recast the definition either as… [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
Nonetheless, retired federal Judge Shira Scheindlin gives it a go, and she comes with the cred of having been the judge in Floyd v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:40 am by Dan Bomsztyk, Olswang LLP
Floyd LJ cited the case of Bankers Trust Co v Namdar [1997] EGCS 20 in contrast to the present case. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
 Having rejected Figure 2, Birss J should not have found the claims obvious, Genentech alleged.Not so, said Floyd LJ. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 6:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The State Legislature in Connecticut was among the public bodies that took action, resulting in this ruling that probably deserves more attention.The case is Connecticut State Police Union v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Retirement System excludes expense allowance payments received pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement in determining the retirement allowanceMatter of Maillard v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 57 AD3d 1299Glenn Maillard, John Raptis and John Pidgeon retired from their respective administrative positions with the William Floyd Union Free School District [Albany County].Maillard, a Tier II member of the New York State Teachers’… [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
Retirement System excludes expense allowance payments received pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement in determining the retirement allowanceMatter of Maillard v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2008 NY Slip Op 10100, Decided on December 24, 2008, Appellate Division, Third Department Glenn Maillard, John Raptis and John Pidgeon retired from their respective administrative positions with the William Floyd Union Free School District [Albany County]. [read post]