Search for: "Fontenot v. Scott*"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2016, 2:22 pm
Tip: even if there might be a valid point somewhere in the decision (and I’m not saying there is), you should consider whether another case (or six) making that point might be available before citing Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
(quoting Fontenot v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
"'This is not to say, however, that a motion to amend should be employed to introduce evidence that was available at trial but was not proffered, to relitigate old issues, to advance new theories, or to secure a rehearing on the merits.'" Pollack, 1990 WL 194282 at *1 (quoting Fontenot v. [read post]
