Search for: "For a Song, Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 1,719
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2021, 1:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Robinhood Markets, Inc., No. 21-cv-02304-LB (N.D. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:07 am by Jonathan Bailey
The lawsuit was filed by Latin American Music Company Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 9:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
The lawsuit was filed by AOM Music, Inc., who owns the rights to DJ Playero’s Playero 37 mixtape. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:22 am by Richard Hunt
Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Robinhood Markets, Inc., 2021 WL 2435307, No. 21-cv-02304-LB (N.D. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
Sirius XM Radio, Inc., the Ninth Circuit confronted the issue of “whether digital and satellite radio stations have a duty to pay public performance royalties for pre-1972 songs under [California] copyright law. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
The case began in 2013, when Flo & Eddie sued Sirius XM Radio, Inc. for playing the Turtles’ iconic pre-1972 recordings, such as “Happy Together” and “Elenore. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
The case began in 2013, when Flo & Eddie sued Sirius XM Radio, Inc. for playing the Turtles’ iconic pre-1972 recordings, such as “Happy Together” and “Elenore. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am by Editor Charlie
  They also have retained the copyrights to many of their songs and are self-administered songwriters with respect to those nondramatic musical works. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
 Introduction The following Comments are respectfully submitted by the signatory organizations Songwriters Guild of America, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]