Search for: "Ford v. General Motors" Results 1 - 20 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
The automobile manufacturer and energy company intervenors that supported the waiver included Ford Motor Company, Volkswagen Group of America, BMW of North America, American Honda Motor Co., Volvo Car USA, the National Coalition for Advanced Transportation, Advanced Energy Economy, Calpine Corporation, National Grid USA, the New York Power Authority, and the Power Companies Climate Coalition. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
I will lose the opportunity to bill for services in this case and in others (although I generally donate most fees related to courtroom testimony to charitable organizations, the lack of opportunity to do so is an injury to me). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
The measure of damages is generally the fair market value of the land immediately before the taking minus its fair market value immediately after the taking. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm by Aaron Moss
Ford Motor Co., the court rejected Bette Midler’s section 3344 claim in connection with a Ford television commercial in which a Midler soundalike sang a song that Midler had made famous. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Tobin Admin
They also sought attorneys’ fees, general damages, special damages, punitive damages, and recovery for wrongful death. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:13 am by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
Vehicles included in the recall: BMW – 627,615 vehicles affected: 2000 – 2005 3 Series Sedan 2000 – 2006 3 Series Coupe 2000 – 2005 3 Series Sports Wagon 2000 – 2006 3 Series Convertible 2001 – 2006 M3 Coupe 2001 – 2006 M3 Convertible Chrysler/Dodge – 3.3 million vehicles affected: 2005-2008 Chrysler 300 2007-2008 Chrysler Aspin 2006-2007 Dodge Charger 2003-2008 Dodge Ram 1500 2005-2008 Dodge Ram 2500 2005-2008 Dodge Dakota 2005-2008… [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
The court found the domicile to be in New York, thus, to the disappointment of the heirs, the publicity rights followed Monroe to the grave.In 2010, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem sued General Motors for the unauthorized use of an image of Albert Einstein in a humorous advertisement of a General Motors’ vehicle, depicting the physicist topless (Case no. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
That framing recapitulates a key point in Gorsuch’s concurrence in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]