Search for: "Ford v. United States of America" Results 181 - 200 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
” According to the National Park Service, the Act provided “the first general legal protection of cultural and natural resources in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
  My personal belief is that he's preparing a run for the Republican nomination for President of the United States of America, expecting his campaign to be financed by his good friends at Comcast. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Hyundai Motor America, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court S D California: False marking affirmative defenses – Laches & unclean hands are in, advice of Counsel is out: Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
 Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat)   United States… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner)   Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office)   Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46)   South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” Perales won League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
United States is cited in the following article: Anna Roberts, Arrests as Guilt, 70 Ala. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
In the United States, a handful of instances were identified involving Internet service providers (ISPs) slowing transmission speeds (“throttling”) or limiting access to competitors’ services, but those cases were resolved through existing means by the FCC or the courts. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
In the United States, a handful of instances were identified involving Internet service providers (ISPs) slowing transmission speeds (“throttling”) or limiting access to competitors’ services, but those cases were resolved through existing means by the FCC or the courts. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]