Search for: "Fordham v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 10:12 am
The 25 papers are organized into the following six parts: Part I: Investor-State Arbitration; Part II: Arbitrator Ethics; Part III: Damages in International Commercial Arbitration; Part IV: The Theory and Philosophy of International Arbitration; Part V: Investor-State Mediation; and Part VI: Mediation in the Context of Arbitration. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:04 am
Ben Zipursky (Fordham) has posted Snyder v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:47 pm
City Square of the Fordham Urban Law Journal features a give-and-take between Professors Victor Romero (Penn State) and Won Kidane (Seattle) about Professor Romero's article Decriminalizing Border Crossings, 38 Fordham Urb. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm
In Awad v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Tax Prof Amicus Briefs for the Government: John Brooks (Fordham), David Gamage (Indiana) Brian Galle (Georgetown), Cliff Fleming (BYU), Jacob Goldin (Chicago), Edward McCaffery (USC), Ajay Mehrotra (Northwestern), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) Ari Glogower (Northwestern), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), NYU Tax Law Center Andy Grewal (Iowa)... [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:37 am
The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal's 2010 Symposium: Is Silence Golden? [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:55 am
Zipursky (Fordham University - School of Law) has posted Punitive Damages after Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:20 pm
Rev. ____ (2007), at Penn State today. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:21 pm
More generally, the merits and shortcomings of section 512 were discussed at length: an animated debate ensued, in fact, following up on Hartline's last point regarding the stated lack of cooperation between rightholders and service providers. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:37 pm
Wong, who gave a snapshot of the state of play of gTLD applications. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
In this case, Fordham J scrutinised the nature of “Everyone In” and analysed whether it was a “policy”, such as to impose public law duties on the Secretary of State on its curtailment. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:33 am
In the meantime, the Institute has been rebuilt and the shabby-chic has been replaced with a state of the art new facility. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
Virginia, and Disproportionality in the Child Welfare System, 86 Fordham L. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
Notably, Judge Newman dissented, stating that “failure to adhere closely to ba [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 5:36 pm
In Mazur v. eBay, eBay represented that a third party service was "safe. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 10:58 am
Here is the abstract: In Glossip v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
Wainwright, twenty-three state... [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:49 pm
Here is the abstract: Recently in Porter v. [read post]
