Search for: "Foreman v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 6:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
In this case, the Judge below had not misdirected himself in saying ‘reside at’ is more than ‘living at’ (this was simply a misqutation, which should have been ‘reside with is something more than living at’ per Sachs LJ in Foreman v Beagley [1969] 1 WLR 1387). [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:49 pm
A juror's opinion on the foreman's state of mind is inadmissible. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 7:01 am
In a decision last week by New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals held in Duffy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 10:33 am
Senator Martin was empanelled on the jury and made foreman. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:51 am
United States, which allowed a company to be held criminally liable any time an employee commits a crime intended to help the company. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 24, 2008 Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 7:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:23 pm
"Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
One case the Supremes decided not to consider included a bizarre church-state angle in which the jury foreman pulled out his Bible and began quoting scripture to convince fellow jurors to vote for a death penalty verdict. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:46 am
Oregon for states to allow criminal convictions by less than unanimous verdicts. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:15 am
Louisiana Issue: Whether the Sixth Amendment, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, allows criminal convictions based on non-unanimous jury verdicts.And this one shows how times have changed:Case name: Lowery, et al. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 10:42 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:30 pm
United StatesIssue: Whether criminal defendants must object at the time a sentence is imposed in order to challenge the sentence as either procedurally or substantively unreasonable under United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:32 am
TexasIssue: Whether, under the Sixth Amendment, a jury foreman may read Bible passages during deliberations to persuade holdout jurors to impose the death penalty. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:41 am
"); United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:49 am
For those interested in jury related issues, U.S. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005); Apprendi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
