Search for: "Forest Watch v. US Forest Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
Wilderness Watch appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Forest Service on Counts I and II, and Cook County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, Conservationists with Common Sense, and Arrowhead Coalition for Multiple Use (collectively Intervenors) appeal from the district court's NEPA ruling. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:21 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm
Learn more about the vacancies at https://www.narf.org/contact-us/join-team/ NARF also invites current law clerks and recent law school graduates with a strong background in federal Indian law and public service to apply for a two-year fellowship to focus on voting rights and environmental issues. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
United States Forest Service, et al. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
United States Forest Service v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
And now on to the luxurious splendor of Relist Watch Select™. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
/California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Video specimen of use here].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: See any WYHA? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Tune in this October to see whether the Relist Watch team can muster the energy to do this one last time, or if Justice Anthony Kennedy will outlast us. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:17 am
United States Forest Service, 87 F.3d 339, 343 (9th Cir. 1996) ; Cray Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:59 pm
Forest Service says that if the ruling stands, it would have to obtain more than 400,000 permits, working with 46 states, a process that could take 10 years. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
In that context, protective orders can be used to limit the dissemination of materials that will not ultimately prove admissible at trial, Fed R. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
To access previous editions of Petitions to Watch, visit our archives on SCOTUSwiki. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 426-427; Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Patent Baristas) US: Teva releases second video in year of affordable healthcare campaign (SmartBrief) US: Discussion of NYT article ‘Crop Scientists Say Biotechnology Seed Companies are Thwarting Research’ (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US FDA: Genetically engineered organisms can be patented (RelatIP) US: Kabushiki Kaisha Hayashibara Seibutsu Kaguku Kenkyujo seeks review and correction of patent term adjustment for patent covering… [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Earth Island Institute, et al. (07-463), on whether the Forest Service was improperly enjoined from implementing various regulations, and whether the underlying challenge was ripe for judicial review; and Crawford v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm
Forest Service, the agency landlords for most of the 640 million acres owned by the U.S. government, are required to generate business –friendly alternatives in their own planning. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(Class 46) (The Trademark Blog) Are goods or services similar? [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am
Forest Manor, Inc., 7:16-CV-01774-RDP, 2018 WL 2770203 (N.D. [read post]
