Search for: "Forrest v. Forrest" Results 181 - 200 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 5:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s claims that the defendant could have negotiated a more favorable settlement, that her former spouse would have accepted a settlement offer that was more favorable to her, or that she would have received a more favorable outcome at trial had she declined to enter into the settlement are conclusory and speculative (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d 1504, 1506; Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:42 am by WSLL
Order Reversing Judgment and Sentence November 14, 2013Case Name: TAYLOR FORREST COBB v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:04 pm
  This was recently upheld in the case of Jay Lange v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Forrest has not yet issued a decision on the plaintiff’s motion. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lower Drug Prices for Consumers (LDPFC) v. [read post]