Search for: "Forrester v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am by Margaret Wood
  This doctrine was established in the 1920 United States Supreme Court case Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
Absent the use of actual footage, the motion picture Forrest Gump might as well be just a box of chocolates. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice and the defendants were entitled to dismissal of that cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909; Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d at 728). [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:29 am
Citing Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, the court explained that to establish a claim for retaliation, a claimant was required to prove the following four elements: [1] he or she had engaged in protected activity; [2] his or her employer was aware that he or she had engaged in such activity; [3] he or she suffered an adverse employment action based upon his or her activity; [4] there is a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse… [read post]