Search for: "Forth v. Forth" Results 1 - 20 of 21,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 8:16 am by CMS
Overview The appeal of the decision in McCulloch and Ors v Forth Valley Health Board [2021] CSIH 21 was heard by the Supreme Court on 10 May 2023. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm by Barsumian Armiger
We previously wrote a personal injury and medical malpractice blog about the decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals in Korakis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
The thought behind this was that if the parties could not agree which medical professional was going to govern the case then the government would decide, thus cutting down on litigation, ergo costs, and resulting in less dispute.The theory didn't translate into practice and one of the more common complaints I hear as I travel the state is that the QME process a) doesn't work as intended, b) is not timely, c) doesn't have enough physicians who know what they're doing, and d) has… [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:30 pm
The retirement option of the divorced spouse should reflect the equitable distribution formula set forth in Majauskas  McVeigh v Curry, 2012 NY Slip Op 07091, Appellate Division, Second Department In a matrimonial action, Supreme Court directed the plaintiff to furnish her former spouse with a copy of her birth certificate essentially for the purposes of his electing the 100% joint and survivor option of his pension fund or his obtaining life insurance and directed the… [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:09 am by Matrix Law
On 23 March 2012, Mr McCulloch, aged 39, was admitted to the Forth Valley Royal Hospital complaining of chest pains, nausea and vomiting. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 8:33 am by Legal Profession Prof
A non-attorney town court justice was censured by the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct As set forth below, on April 26, 2017, while presiding over People v Tysean Harris, respondent denied defense counsel's request to adjourn the defendant's preliminary... [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:14 am
However, the complaint failed to comply with CPLR 3016(a), which requires that a complaint sounding in defamation "set forth the particular words complained of'" (Simpson v Cook Pony Farm Real Estate, Inc., 12 AD3d 496, 497, quoting CPLR 3016[a]; see Fusco v Fusco, 36 AD3d 589). [read post]