Search for: "Foster et al v. Andersen et al"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Dahl, et al., Science, 2003, 299, 96-99. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
