Search for: "Foster v. Commissioner of Correction (No. 2)" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This will consider whether the approach in Harrison v Black Horse [2011] EWCA Civ 1128 is correct: ie. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Explainer blog to follow “BBC News on evidence to the House of Commons Education Select Committee inquiry into fostering and the ‘State of the Nation’s Fostering’ report. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
On 22 November 2023, the Court of Appeal (Bean, Andrew and Lewis LLJ) handed down judgment in Department for Business and Trade v Information Commissioner  [2023] EWCA Civ 1378. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Attachments: # 1 Corrected Complaint, # 2 Corrected Motion and Memorandum for Temporary Restraining Order)(Gupta, Deepak) (Entered: 11/27/2017) 11/27/2017 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Timothy J. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Attachments: # 1 Corrected Complaint, # 2 Corrected Motion and Memorandum for Temporary Restraining Order)(Gupta, Deepak) (Entered: 11/27/2017) 11/27/2017 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Timothy J. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
TikTok is already facing a legal challenge from the former Children’s Commissioner for England over its collection and processing of children’s data. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29919-20 Hall v Express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication. 28851-20 Tomlin v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 27994-20 Odewale and Yadav v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 27841-20 Dainton v Bristol Post,… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
PCAOB,2 the Court seemingly ignored the majority’s convulted definition of a Department from Freytag v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
PCAOB,2 the Court seemingly ignored the majority’s convulted definition of a Department from Freytag v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
 G is currently placed with local authority foster carers. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The same blog also notes the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant permission to appeal in the case of Craven v Information Commissioner & DECC, permission to appeal. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]