Search for: "Foster v. Medical Division" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic writes that although “[i]n the wake of the divisive Brett Kavanaugh hearings, Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday tried to assure the public that the US Supreme Court serves the whole country, not one political party over another, and that it is committed to collegiality,” “America’s highest court is deeply split along ideological and political lines, and Roberts sometimes fosters that divide. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 9:31 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
This lawlessness is fostered because these judges sit in district divisions with only a single (or perhaps two) active judges. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:16 am
Volokh reports on New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
With respect to legal custody, the court awarded the father decision-making authority, after consultation with the mother, over educational and medical issues. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
So now we've got to deal with this grotesque chimera of product liability and misrepresentation set loose to lumber across the California landscape.Just about the only bright side (from our defense-minded perspective) of the whole Conte mess is that apparently a decision by one panel ("division") of the California Court of Appeal has next to no stare decisis effect on other divisions of the Court of Appeal, even within the same appellate district. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
According to Division One of the Fourth Appellate District, the answer is no. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 6, October 13 and October 27 conferences)   Livingwell Medical Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Recent Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division Wage and Hour Division (WHD) guidance reveals the WHD adopts a very broad view of the circumstances under which a when a child with no legal or biological relationship to an employee can qualify as a “son or daughter” for purposes of determining rights of the employee under the FMLA based on the birth , adoption, placement for adoption or need to care for the  child during a serious illness and a… [read post]