Search for: "Foster v. Strickland"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2023, 8:49 am
Today's advance release habeas opinion: Foster v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Civil Rights Found. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
In its decision, the court also reaffirmed the standard established in Strickland v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:20 pm
When faced with a claim of juror bias, Remmer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
Alabama, 16-9282 Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Strickland v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
The city of Philadelphia wants to exclude Catholic Social Services from participating in its foster-care program unless the organization ends its practice, based on its religious teachings on marriage, of not providing written endorsements for same-sex couples seeking to be foster parents. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Foster, an attorney employed by Carlisle, (collectively, "Defendants"). [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 9:31 am
The defense argued that Lockett v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Foster, 12-420, and the more staccato Ryan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
See Roberts v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Daman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Alabama, 15-7553, were all tossed back to lower courts for further Batson-style rumination in light of Foster v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
Smith should be revisited; and (3) whether the government violates the First Amendment by conditioning a religious agency’s ability to participate in the foster-care system on taking actions and making statements that directly contradict the agency’s religious beliefs. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Strickland ((07-689), but found the inquiry confusing, frustrating and inconclusive. [read post]
