Search for: "Foster v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 6:18 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
Which brings us back to this case. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:33 am
Corp. v Carter, 99 AD3d 692, 693 [2d Dept 2012] [internal quotations marks omitted]). [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, affirmed. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, affirmed. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am
Steel Hector & Davis, 2007 US Dist LEXIS 72864, * 33 [NDNY 2007]; see also Nardella v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:40 am
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
Krieger, 65 AD3d 1350, 886 N.Y.S.2d 463 [2d Dept 2009]; and Mark T. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter observed that in Bast v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
The foster mother testified that the child called Joseph T. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Justice Dillon noted that allegations of adultery present unique issues of proof. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Instead, she denied any mental health-related issues and maintained that the child remained in foster care because the agency wanted to fraudulently collect foster care payments from the government. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
But Justice Gorsuch's predilections of meaning tells us nothing of the meaning Congress might have used. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
