Search for: "Four Seasons Produce, Inc. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On April 23, 2019, the Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF) and several cattle producers filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois against Tyson Foods, JBS, Cargill, and National Beef—the four largest meat packing companies in the country—alleging that the defendants had conspired to suppress the price of fed cattle purchased in the United States from at least January 1, 2015 through the… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:24 pm by My name
The suit was filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a court that has previously ruled in favor of the league on similar disputes (in NBA v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
In four-time relist Johnson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Stouffer declined, and National Geographic ended up airing the series in 2012 under the title “Untamed Americas” within the United States, and “Wild America” outside of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against… [read post]
We also expect more disclosure, given the Commission’s endorsement of the principle expressed in the seminal case of TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]