Search for: "Foy v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Foi pesquisador sênior do IDEA – Programa de Estudos Avançados (grupo de pesquisa vinculado à ECO/UFRJ). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:49 pm
Jarkesy and Corner Post v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Data privacy and data protection The ICO has taken regulatory action against five public authorities, including two police forces, the Department for Education and the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office, for failing to meet their obligations under the FOI Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided in Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In this re-hearing of the Appellant’s appeal, the court had to decide whether the FOI request was lawfully denied. 5RB summa [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
Lauzon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm
R. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
” The review decision barely dealt with this, stating: “140. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The ICO’s director of FOI and Transparency said that the “Council’s failure to comply with the law erodes trust in democracy and open government. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:16 am
Housen v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Brown, 2022 SCC 18 [2] At common law, automatism is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Action4Canada v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1507 (CanLII) [71] Put simply, individuals have standing to question whether state actions infringe their Charter protected rights. [read post]
