Search for: "Foy v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
(Canfield v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am
However, the Academies Act 2010 includes a provision that extends the FOI Act to academy trusts. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
This support for the status quo on FoI will be seen as a boost for the campaign to protect it from being weakened. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
’” See Barcelona.com, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
As already mentioned, on 26 March 2015 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the “Prince of Wales” letters FOI case of R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General ([2015] UKSC 21), heard 24 and 25 November 2014. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:00 am
Maclean v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
This has been launched as part of the Hands Off FoI campaign. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
I thoroughly appreciate the difficult position that Professor Cronon finds himself in, especially as I am a public official in the state of Florida, which has arguably the most exacting sunshine laws in the country (enshrined in our state constitution no less) and where one of the key state supreme court decisions enforcing the open meeting act concerned a dean search at my law school (Wood v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
United States U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
In University of Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm
United States, in which Justice Brandeis concurred, that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market” and in 1974, Justice Powell wrote in Gertz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Finally, the summary by Lewison J in Thompson v Foy was an accurate and helpful summary of the law, contra Link Lending's arguments. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Finally, the summary by Lewison J in Thompson v Foy was an accurate and helpful summary of the law, contra Link Lending's arguments. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(See: Hamilton, para. 37) The Applicant’s factum states, the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 8:32 am
DeGraff, Foy, Conway, Holt-Harris & Mealey
U.S. [read post]
